Type to search


By Pouring Billions Into Fossil Fuel Industry, EU’s Central Bank Accused of ‘Playing Both Firefighter and Arsonist’

Christine Lagarde à l'Université d'été du MEDEF en 2009. Date: 3 September 2009 Source: https://www.flickr.com/photos/besoindair/3883418915/ Author: MEDEF

“By recklessly buying billions in fossil fuel bonds the bank is propping up the single biggest obstacle to tackling the climate crisis.”

(By: Jessica Corbett, Common Dreams) After the European Union’s central bank on Thursday approved what Reuters called “a bigger-than-expected” expansion of an economic stimulus package necessitated by the coronavirus pandemic, climate campaigners expressed concern that planet-destroying fossil fuel companies could get tens of billions of dollars in the Eurozone relief funding.

The European Central Bank (ECB) Governing Council extended an emergency asset purchase program to June 2021 and expanded it by €600 billion to a total of €1.350 trillion. Reuters reported that the figure “was a compromise after policymakers discussed an expansion of between €500 billion and €750 billion.”

Ahead of the council’s Thursday meeting, 45 European groups endorsed an open letter encouraging ECB President Christine Lagarde to align the program with the goals of the 2015 Paris climate agreement and over 114,000 people signed a petition from SumOfUs, Reclaim Finance, and 350.org urging the bank to stop funding the climate crisis.

However, activists pointed out, the council declined to even address the climate crisis at the meeting, let alone block future fossil fuel funding. SumOfUs campaigner Leyla Larbi accused the ECB of “playing both firefighter and arsonist by strengthening multinational corporations pushing our climate to the brink with billions of euros.”

In a joint statement, the groups behind the petition explained that the ECB’s expansion of the asset purchase program “could finance polluters to up to €90 billion,” meaning that the bank could ultimately “channel up to €220 billion to these companies while indiscriminately buying corporate assets to respond to the crisis.”

The groups highlighted a Reclaim Finance analysis showing that 38 fossil fuel companies have received ECB support. “Most of these companies—like Shell or Total—plan on greatly increasing their fossil fuel production and one of them—Fortum—is even involved in the opening of a new German coal power plant,” the statement said.

The groups also noted a Wednesday Greenpeace analysis which found that the ECB has already injected over €7.6 billion into fossil fuels since mid-March as part of its Covid-19 relief.

“The ECB and other central banks must change their ways,” Greenpeace climate and energy campaigner Adam Pawloff said in a statement. “As the climate crisis continues to escalate, we can’t afford any more public money going to fossil fuels.”

Campaigners’ condemnation of the ECB’s moves at the Thursday meeting built on outrage and frustration sparked by Greenpeace’s analysis.

“By recklessly buying billions in fossil fuel bonds the bank is propping up the single biggest obstacle to tackling the climate crisis—the fossil fuel industry,” 350.org campaigner Nick Bryer declared Thursday. “This is increasingly looking like a recovery package for polluters, not people, despite the growing support for a truly green and just recovery.”

Since the pandemic started, governments and international bodies worldwide have faced calls for Covid-19 recovery plans that provide direct relief to people not polluters, prioritize public health, and incorporate abmitious policies that tackle the human-caused climate crisis, including a just transition away from fossil fuels to clean energy.

In a Thursday blog post for 350.org—which has spearheaded the global push for a just recovery—campaigner Julia Krzyszkowska called out Lagarde and her fellow bank governors for ignoring climate science and “shirking their historic responsibility to lead Europe out of the post-pandemic economic crisis into a cleaner, fairer, safer future.”

Guest Post

Citizen Truth republishes articles with permission from a variety of news sites, advocacy organizations and watchdog groups. We choose articles we think will be informative and of interest to our readers. Chosen articles sometimes contain a mixture of opinion and news, any such opinions are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of Citizen Truth.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *