Type to search

ANTI WAR OPINION

Why Samantha Power Should Not Hold Public Office

Samantha Power, Director of Multilateral Affairs at the National Security Council, speaking about Sergio Vieira de Mello at an event at the United Nations Office at Geneva on June 1, 2010. Power is the author of "Chasing the Flame: Sergio Vieira de Mello and the Fight to Save the World". Date: 1 June 2010, 15:00:47 Source: originally posted to Flickr as Samantha Power Speaking in Geneva Author: United States Mission Geneva Photo: Eric Bridiers
(The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of Citizen Truth.)

(David Swanson) It took a variety of approaches to market the 2003 war on Iraq. For some it was to be a defense against an imagined threat. For others it was false revenge. But for Samantha Power it was philanthropy. She said at the time, “An American intervention likely will improve the lives of the Iraqis. Their lives could not get worse, I think it’s quite safe to say.” Needless to say, it wasn’t safe to say that.

Did Power learn a lesson? No, she went on to promote a war on Libya, which proved disastrous.

Then did she learn? No, she took an explicit position against learning, publicly arguing for the duty not to dwell on the results in Libya as that might impede willingness to wage war on Syria.

Samantha Power may never learn, but we can. We can stop allowing her to hold public office.

We can tell every U.S. Senator to reject her nomination to lead the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).

Samantha Power, as “Human Rights Director” at the National Security Council and Ambassador to the United Nations, supported the U.S.-Saudi war on Yemen and Israeli attacks on Palestine, denouncing criticisms of Israel and helping block international responses to the attacks on Yemen.

Power has been a major proponent of hostility toward Russia and of unfounded and exaggerated allegations against Russia.

Power has, in lengthy articles and books, shown remarkably little (if any) regret for all the wars she’s promoted, choosing instead to focus on her regret for missed opportunities for wars that didn’t happen, especially in Rwanda — which she misleadingly depicts as a situation not caused by militarism, but in which a military attack would have supposedly reduced rather than increased suffering.

We don’t need war advocates who use more humanitarian language. We need peace advocates.

Pssst, while you're here...

President Biden has nominated a far less enthusiastic war proponent than usual to direct the CIA, but it’s not clear how much that will matter if Power is running USAID. According to Allen Weinstein, a co-founder of the National Endowment for Democracy, an organization funded by USAID, “A lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA.”

USAID has financed efforts aimed at overthrowing governments in Ukraine, Venezuela, and Nicaragua. The last thing we need right now is a USAID run by a habitual “intervener.”

Here’s a link to an online email-your-senators campaign to reject Samantha Power.

Here’s some more reading:

Alan MacLeod: “A Record Of Hawkish Intervention: Biden Picks Samantha Power To Head USAID”

David Swanson: “Samantha Power Can See Russia from Her Padded Cell”

The Intercept: “Top Samantha Power Aide is Now Lobbying to Undermine Opponents of Yemen War”

David Swanson: “Lies About Rwanda Mean More Wars if Not Corrected”

Tags:
David Swanson

David Swanson is an author, activist, journalist, and radio host. He is director of WorldBeyondWar.org and campaign coordinator for RootsAction.org. Swanson’s books include War Is A Lie and When the World Outlawed War. He blogs at DavidSwanson.org and WarIsACrime.org. He hosts Talk Nation Radio. He is a 2015, 2016, 2017 Nobel Peace Prize Nominee.

You Might also Like

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *