Type to search

HEALTH/SCI/TECH

Bayer/Monsanto Loses Big Again in Second RoundUp Trial

Anti-Monsanto Protest, May 25, 2013 March from Union Square to Washington Square, New York, NY (Photo by Ed Waywuwei)
Anti-Monsanto Protest, May 25, 2013 March from Union Square to Washington Square, New York, NY (Photo: Ed Waywuwei)

A San Francisco federal court awarded a Sonoma County landowner $80.3 million on March 27, in the second lawsuit against Monsanto’s popular herbicide, RoundUp.

Edwin Hardeman, 70, is one of 11,200 product users who have filed lawsuits against Monsanto, arguing that the herbicide caused their non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and that the company buried evidence rather than warning consumers of the plausible health impacts.

Hardeman’s trial was conducted in a two-part sequence to preserve the validity of the jury’s assessment on the link between RoundUp and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. It is one of three trials likely to have a major influence on the remaining lawsuits filed, although the defendants claim that each trial will be individually assessed.

The San Francisco jury ruled in Hardeman’s favor and found that Monsanto had knowingly marketed lethal products; thus, awarding $75 million in punitive damages as a result. This was tacked on to $200,000 to cover expenses and economic losses and $5 million to compensate for past and future suffering.

Bayer vs Hardeman Trial judge

Hardeman’s case was held before US District Judge Vince Chhabria.

For 26 years, Hardeman used Roundup as an herbicide on his plot of land in Sonoma County. Then, he was diagnosed with lymph cancer, which the World Health Organization has linked to glyphosate, the active ingredient in the herbicide.

The International Agency for Research on Cancer listed glyphosate as a probable carcinogen in 2015, yet the Environmental Protection Agency has not banned the substance.

Over the past year, researchers have found glyphosate present in cereal, and beer and wine.

After the verdict was announced on Wednesday, Jennifer Moore, one of Hardeman’s lawyers, said, “My message to the EPA is, you need to look at glyphosate again.”

The trial judge can choose to lessen or alter the fiscal award – as it stands it currently ranks as the third-largest sum to be awarded by a jury in a product liability case so far in 2019, according to Bloomberg.

Bayer AG acquired Monsanto for $63 billion last June. In August 2018, the first trial against Roundup reached its verdict, and groundskeeper Dewayne Johnson was awarded $78.6 million in damages.

Both juries found Monsanto guilty for negligence and confirmed that there was a connection between Hardeman and Johnson’s illnesses and their exposure to RoundUp.

Lawyers representing the company have defended their innocence, stating that the herbicide is safe.

“We are disappointed with the jury’s decision, but this verdict does not change the weight of over four decades of extensive science and the conclusions of regulators worldwide that support the safety of our glyphosate-based herbicides and that they are not carcinogenic,” Bayer said in a released media statement. “Bayer will appeal this verdict.”

Bayer has lost more than 60 percent of its value since acquiring Monsanto, and on Thursday, March 28, its shares fell to their lowest point in more than six years.

 

If you enjoyed this article, please consider supporting independent news and getting our newsletter three times a week.

Tags:

You Might also Like

2 Comments

  1. Kurt April 1, 2019

    Bayer is no better than monsanto. I am a sheetmetal worker. “Retired, ” when I worked in St. Louis I worked a number of jobs at the Bayer insecticide plant, in south St.Louis. we weren’t offered ppe’s to work in, but the Bayer employees all wore respirators and tyvek suits. It had rained that morning and we took our brake out on the roof. There was a puddle of water on the roof, and a pidgeon was drinking from it. When it was done drinking it landed on a powerline, sat there for a few minutes, then fell over dead.
    Once again this is CAPITALISM. too greedy to be safe.

    Reply
  2. jjdoublej April 1, 2019

    This is all about GREED….by Lawyers. We have WAY too many lawyers in this country and we keep churning them out. By the way, these 2 cases will be appealed and so this is by far not over or decided.

    The whole objective by lawyers is to get a big settlement based on emotion. No such thing coming anytime soon. The jurors don’t understand the science, and the lawyers know this. But they do understand emotion. All these lawsuits do is enrich the lawyers….period.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.